A clean migration queue is not proof of complete coverage
Resolved migration markers did not account for every linguistic unit, and visible labels enclosed in angle brackets were missing from the initial review inventory.
Problem
Resolved migration markers did not account for every linguistic unit, and visible labels enclosed in angle brackets were missing from the initial review inventory.
Context
The update mixed reused content, changed context and technical records. A text-presence count alone could overstate review coverage.
Solution
Reconciled the inventory against the pinned source, added eight visible labels to the linguistic scope, and separated dialogue and UI from comments, controls and technical values.
Verification
Compared approved review decisions with a fresh extraction and checked source identity, placeholders, grammar composition and package round-trip.
Result
The supplied catalog was reviewed as 9,694 distinct linguistic units, with the eight recovered labels included and no double-counting of technical records.
Evidence covers the 26 October 2026 static delivery. Exact commercial patch compatibility and runtime behavior remain unverified.
Original process summary; no protected dialogue or private code.